Next Creation Science Forum
Tuesday, Sept 5, 2017
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Farm and Home Center of Lancaster
Stay tuned to this site for information about our next Creation Science Forum in the Fall and have a great summer!
Meanwhile, check out our video page to see previous Forums
Creation/Evolution in the News
Scientists Confirm: Darwinism Is Broken
Is the cat finally out of the evolutionary bag? Creationists have been saying for decades that the notion of evoution (that is, large-scale complexity changes, not adaptation, which is commonly called "micro-evolution") cannot generate the new information needed to increase the complexity of life. Now some evolutionist scientists are saying the same thing (quoted from the attached article):
"the neo-Darwinian mechanism of mutation and natural selection lacks the creative power to generate the novel anatomical traits and forms of life that have arisen during the history of life."
This is not to say that neo-Darwinism is dead, because at most, it would be re-defined still as a molecules-to-man process with no intelligence required. Stay tuned.
Did You Know ?
This past Chrismas, PBS posted a series of videos on YouTube, called "The 12 Days of Evolution." The purpose, of course, was to encourage viewers to reject the Bible from the very beginning. Answers in Genesis has written a rebuttal, found by clicking
Which Came First, the Environment or the Trait?
From this article: "Millions of years of horse development suggest that one of the key assumptions of evolutionary theory may be wrong." This "key" assumption is that species evolve traits first and then move into whatever environment is advantageous for their population growth (called "adaptive radiation"). This study, however, showed the opposite - that changes in the environment drive greater genetic variablity; i.e., new traits and new species. Why is this important? They say "the radiation of equids (i.e., horses) has been cited as a textbook example of adaptive radiation for more than a century, as it is crucial to the development of evolutionary theory linking trait evolution and adaptive success." So if this "key" assumption is wrong, how about other "key" assumptions, like the ability of molecules to develop codes and messages without intelligence? Creationists have long known that speciation is driven by environmental changes acting on the genes but this is definitely NOT evolution (particles-to-people), but rather adaptation. Horses may have changed over the years, but they nevertheless remained horses.
Mind over Matter? What's the Matter? Never Mind!
From the introduction of quantum mechanics into the field of physics at the beginning of the 20th century until today, the real nature of matter has confounded physicists. According to Newton, you could know where a baseball was and how fast it was moving. However, as physicists looked at smaller and smaller bits of matter, the level of knowledge was reduced to "probabilities" rather than certainties. However, it is worse than that because we don't even know what matter
, let alone
it is and how fast it moves. Given this problem, when scientists ponder where "conciousness" came from, the majority of mainstream scientists believe that it simply came from the matter, whatever that is! According to this article,
Consciousness might, for example, be an example of the emergence of a new entity in the Universe not contained in the laws of particles."
Yuh think?? The good news is that this "new entity" in the Universe is the very
of the Universe itself and He cares for you enough to grant salvation by grace alone so that you can live eternally and "never mind" about the "matters" of life.